What could we do better in schools today? ... We have to kind of
find a way to get today's kids to embrace change. We have to get them
to want to constantly learn new types of things. And the catch, to me,
is somehow we have to find a way to get kids to play with knowledge. To
play with finding information. To play with creating knowledge. Not
always believing that it's already known, but basically being willing to
believe that maybe they should be able to create knowledge on the fly
by experimenting with things.
And...
So I think we can construct new kinds of learning environments. Not
only are we learning with and from each other, not only are we teaching
each other as well, but we're actually understanding that authority -
to some extent - lies in whether or not this thing I've just built is as
good as I think it could be ....
What suggestions do you have for students and teachers who wish to
implement more "tinkering" and "playful" scenarios in the classroom and
in life? Please post in the comments below. For Maria Popova's (@brainpicker) article on A New Culture of Learning available on Brain Pickings (@brainpickings), please click here.
Description of image: A child "tinkering" away. Photo located at graphics8.nytimes.com. Kildonan and its IP program claim no ownership over the above picture.
Though he writes solely on his experience learning
jazz, pianist and composer Bill Evans certainly has a message to impart
to IPians with his words below: (The man pictured is Bill Evans. This
image was located on tumblr.com. Kildonan and its IP program do not claim any ownership to this photo.):
The whole process of learning the facility of being
able to play jazz is to take these problems from the outer level in, one
by one, and to stay with it at a very intense, conscious-concentration
level until that process becomes secondary and subconscious. Now, when
that becomes subconscious, then you can begin concentrating on that next
problem, which will allow you to do a little bit more.
I don’t consider myself as talented as many people
but in some ways that was an advantage because I didn’t have a great
facility immediately so I had to be more analytical and in a way — that
forced me to build something.
Most people just don’t realize the immensity of the
problem and, either because they can’t conquer it immediately, think
that they haven’t got the ability, or they’re so impatient to conquer it
that they never do see it through. If you do understand the problem then you can enjoy your whole trip through.
People tend to approximate the product rather than
attacking it in a realistic, true way at any elementary level —
regardless of how elementary — but it must be entirely true and entirely
real and entirely accurate. They would rather approximate the entire
problem than to take a small part of it and be real and true about it.
To approximate the whole thing in a vague way gives you a feeling that
you’ve more or less touched the thing, but in this way you just lead
yourself toward confusion and ultimately you’re going to get so confused
that you’ll never find your way out.
It is true of any subject that the person that
succeeds in anything has the realistic viewpoint at the beginning and
[knows] that the problem is large and that he has to take it a step at a
time and that he has to enjoy the step-by-step learning procedure.
They’re trying to do a thing in a way that is so general [that] they
can’t possibly build on that. If they build on that, they’re building on
top of confusion and vagueness and they can’t possibly progress. If you
try to approximate something that is very advanced and don’t know what
you’re doing, you can’t advance.