For information on Luca, we are proud to direct you to a blog that he has opened for another Kildonan class (Social Problems Lab). He has demonstrated admirable digital citizenship by claiming his portal as a space to reflect upon his learning across courses.
Within the blog post linked below, Luca discusses his research into post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), his choice to share his knowledge in the form of a panel, and his self-assessment on his process and the panel's discussion.
Well,
there are reports from all around the world that children are not
asking questions to people. Or at least if they have to ask a question
to a person, they do that after they have asked their phones. Children
don't want to learn how to multiply, divide, add, and subtract because
they say they already know how to do that. It's done with phones.
Children don't want to particularly learn to read because they say there
are things that can read out things to them even if they don't know how
to read. At the moment, they don't like to write by hand because they
want to know why they should learn to write by hand. Will ever do it in
the rest of their lives? So what happens in a world where reading,
writing, and arithmetic are treated in such a cavalier manner?
...
In
Killingworth, this is a room: it just looks like a nice lounge with
computers and an XBox(@XBox) And the teachers, when I built it, they said,
'Sugata, this is a bit too much. Do you have any idea of what they will
do with that XBox? They will do nothing else except play with the
XBox.' So I said, 'Well, that's our challenge, isn't it?' If you've
gone in there to teach Geography and the students are playing with the
XBox, it means that Geography is more boring than the XBox. Then we
should re-look at Geography, chuck it from the curriculum, or put it
into the XBox. Somehow.
Description of the 1st image: Mitra's SOLE learning laboratory in Killingworth, England. Photo located at blog.ted.com. Kildonan and its IP program claim no ownership over the above image.
For a post discussing Mitra's "The child-driven education," please click here.
For a post discussing Mitra's "Build a School in the Cloud," please click here.
Ever
the savvy technology expert, Tim continues to research drones and
game design. He has begun to complement these explorations, too, by
considering the ethics of technology. This discipline concerns itself
with the ethical (or moral) considerations of implementing technology in
our modern age.
Tim possesses opinions that are threefold. First, he sides with the late Steve Jobs, American entrepreneur, marketer, and inventor as well as the co-founder, chairman, and CEO of Apple Inc.
Jobs differentiates between animals and humans in his Steve Jobs on
Bicycle (see below), specifically by citing a study that measures the
"efficiency of locomotion" of various animals traveling across a flat
plane from Point A to Point B. In this experiment, researchers
concluded that the human cannot measure up as a rival to other animals
such as the condor. However, when the researchers then evaluated a
human riding on a bicycle, they compiled data measurements that
significantly dwarfed all other organisms previously measured. After
reading this research, Jobs concluded that human beings are essentially
tool builders; they compensate for natural/biological weaknesses with
the materials that they create.
But Tim goes on to extend Jobs's thinking into a two-pronged critique
our culture. He argues, on one hand, that militaries may wish to curb
innovation for innovation's sake due to the risk of reverse
engineering. If they launch drones without comprehensive research into
drone defense, for instance, cultural enemies may seize the equipment
and use them for counter-measures. On the other hand, he argues that
humans, although they utilize technology, occasionally do not experiment
with this equipment to the best of their ability. This implicit fear
hinders humanity; it retards what otherwise could amount to exponential
progress and growth, forcing us instead to repeatedly re-hash the same
trying problems. In this scenario, human risk a vicious circle and a
technological gap: a dissonance between our technological capabilities
and the technology that we realize and produce.
What do you think of Tim's reasoning? Do you have feedback or a
source that he should explore? Please post in the comments section
below.
Description of 1st image: A computer-generated representation of the ethnics of technology and transhumanism. Photo located at abc.net.au. Kildonan and its IP program claim now ownership over the above graphic.
CEO and one of the founders of Epic Group PLC, Donald Clark (@DonaldClarke63) is committed to the idea that #technology does - and must - play a role in education (passages taken from Clark's bio).
Having spent "30 years experience in online learning, games,
simulations, social media and mobile learning projects," Clark had this
to say about technology in education during a 2012 @TEDxGlasgow event:
The real scalability in education comes with the Internet because it
gives us a world of digital replication for free. A world of digital
abundance where some aspects of learning content are available for
anyone, anywhere, at any time. It absolutely frees us from the tyranny
of time and location. ... And that's the trick: freeing education from a
place, from a specific time.
Now if - as is clearly the case - the Internet and #socialmedia
can lead young people to change the tyrannical and corrupt
governments, can we really say that social media will have no role in
education? How do you think those kids in Tahrir Square (@3alTahrir) learned to avoid tear gas by using Pepsi Cola (@pepsi)? How do you think those revolutions arose first through blogging, then through Facebook, then through Twitter, then through YouTube,
and the ubiquity of mobile devices? We'd be fools to ignore the
pedagogic lessons that are right in front of our eyes, politically and
in terms of education.
What do you think? How can we use social media outlets such as
Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube educationally? Please post in the
comments below.
Description of image: Various social media channels. Picture located at cdn.socialmediaexaminer.com. Kildonan and its IP program claim no ownership over the above graphic.
American educator, parent, author, speaker, blogger, and co-publisher of Educating Modern Learners (EML)Will Richardson (@willrich45) has been called "a trendsetter in education" by The New York Times. He has spoken to tens of thousands of educators in more than a
dozen countries about the value of online learning networks. Two years
ago, he presented at TEDxMelbourne (@TEDxMelbourne), an event that encouraged
educators, parents, and students to think about the "changing nature of
education and how technology can shape the future of learning" (passages
taken from YouTube description of Richardson's talk).
Richardson raises some valid points that we in education must begin to discuss:
We have to start thinking differently about what school is. There's a
great quote that I read by a guy by the name of Justin Reich (the Richard L. Menschel HarvardX Research Fellow, based in the Office of the President and Provost at Harvard University: @bjfr)
who's a teacher at Harvard. And he said, 'You know, the problem right
now is that we're paying so much attention to the measurable part of
learning that we risk neglecting the immeasurable part of learning."
And it's that immeasurable part that - right now, in a world where we
have access to so much stuff - it's that immeasurable stuff, that
hard-to-measure stuff that's much more important. It's that creativity,
that gritty problem-solving, that persevering disposition that we have
toward learning. All that stuff that's really hard to measure? That's
the stuff that our children need right now.
For a post discussing Richardson at TEDxNYED (2011), please click here.
One year ago, Professor
of Educational Technology at the School of Education, Communication and Language Sciences (@secls) at Newcastle University (@StudentsNCL) Sugata Mitra (@Sugatam) won the 2013 TED Prize (@TEDPrize). At TED2013, he delivered his wish that the world help him
"build a school in the cloud." He essentially called upon educators,
parents, and students to assist him in designing a learning experience
whereby all children - located all over the world - can interact with
technology and pursue meaningful questions in environments in which
adults merely support and encourage them. He also addressed these same
populations to implement Self-Organized Learning Environments (SOLEs)
(@schoolincloud) and to forward him the data to serve as the raw materials for upcoming
publications.
What results has Mitra's "wish" engendered far? SOLE Central (@NCLsolecentral) and the beginning of classroom-based implementation of SOLEs.
The learning revolution begins. Will we soon see SOLE-based classrooms at Kildonan...?
So what's happening here?I think what we need to look at is... learningas the product of educational self-organization.If you allow the educational process to self-organize,then learning emerges.It's not about making learning happen.It's about letting it happen.The teacher sets the process in motionand then she stands back in aweand watches as learning happens.I think that's what all this is pointing at.
For our previous post on Sugata Mitra's "The child-driven education," please click here. For a link to Mitra's TED Book, Beyond the Hole in the Wall, please click here.
(SOLE Central, pictured above. Photo located at ncl.ac.uk. Kildonan and its IP program claim no ownership over this image.)
For a post discussing Mitra's "The child-driven education," please click here. For a post discussing Mitra's "School in the Cloud: What Happened after TED Prize 2013," please click here.
An astute and critical researcher, Tim is currently engaged with
various projects. In addition to learning game design through GameSalad.com and
repurposing a car from which to launch a drone with a fellow IP
student, he is currently examining drone operation alongside the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant and Islamic State (otherwise
known as ISIS or ISIL). Tim recognizes that the nature of ISIS - along
with virtually any other story addressed by mainstream media - depends
(in part) upon the news agency (international or otherwise) that a
person decides to consult. Though he encourages the reader to evaluate
any story by consulting a variety of sources (such as the links below),
this post will primarily utilize information from CNN.com (@CNN).
ISIS, led by Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi (a.k.a.
Al-Khalifah Ibrahim), began as a splinter group within al Qaeda. Its
aim, simply stated, is to "create an Islamic state across Sunni areas of
Iraq and Syria." Tim argues that, in some ways, the organization is
already operating as a "nation" by instituting independent police and
food-distribution networks over its "constituents." Over the past year,
the group has garnered international attention and alarm by the United
States for its gruesome executions (including crucifixions and
beheadings) as well as its repeated threats to invade America and "raise
[the] black flag over [the] White House."
Having examined the uproar concerning drones, Tim believes that
Americans need to turn their attention away from these devices. They
need to cease diverting their attention and focus it, as he believes,
upon the true threat: ISIS. He asks: "Who are you scared of?
The terrorist organization that crucifies, tortures and decapitates
people? Or the drones that protect them from you?"
What do you think? Post a response in the comments section below.
How do we define
"teachers" when children can educate themselves using technology?
For a post discussing Mitra's "Build a School in the Cloud," please click here. For a post discussing Mitra's "School in the Cloud: What Happened after TED Prize 2013," please click here.