In this latter piece, Tolkien argues that there is no such thing as "children's literature" as we know it. He writes:
Among those who still have enough wisdom not to think fairy-stories pernicious, the common opinion seems to be that there is a natural connexion between the minds of children and fairy-stories, of the same order as the connexion between children’s bodies and milk. I think this is an error; at best an error of false sentiment, and one that is therefore most often made by those who, for whatever private reason (such as childlessness), tend to think of children as a special kind of creature, almost a different race, rather than as normal, if immature, members of a particular family, and of the human family at large. (347)Though he finds this sentiment stimulating, K. disagrees. He presents his position by arguing that a certain dream logic is bastardized in children's literature. According to him, other branches of literature honor this logic while that directed toward children distort it, introduce it haphazardly, and never explain its functioning.
What do you think? Do you side with Tolkien, with K., or with a position in-between? Please leave a comment below. For your enjoyment, enjoy the following trailer to Tolkien's own fairy-story: The Hobbit (The Battle of the Five Armies).
No comments:
Post a Comment